HP OMEN Notebook

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP OMEN Notebook  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2333
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160526
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 20 '16 at 13:47
Run Duration385 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4720HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
33.8% Below average
Memory 55
1-Core 24
2-Core 46
29% 41.7 Pts
4-Core 70.3
8-Core 110
11% 90.3 Pts
64-Core 114
7% 114 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
HP(103C 2333) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.15.4278
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.71% Terrible
Lighting 0.7
Reflection 4.35
Parallax 1.19
1% 2.08 fps
MRender 1.81
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 1.39
1% 1.2 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 0.71%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung Portable SSD T3 500GB
209GB free
Firmware: 0
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
60.7% Good
Read 415
Write 386
Mixed 412
90% 404 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 20.5
4K Mixed 16
58% 18 MB/s
DQ Read 62.8
DQ Write 59.4
DQ Mixed 29.7
31% 50.6 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 101%
Sandisk SD6PP4M-256G-1006 256GB
124GB free (System drive)
Firmware: A200906 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
31.2% Below average
Read 464
Write 58.7
Mixed 94.4
44% 206 MB/s
4K Read 15.5
4K Write 4.31
4K Mixed 4.55
32% 8.11 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 103%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 124GB
64GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 9% Great: 37%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 124GB
49GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
29.2% Poor
Read 125
Write 34.4
Mixed 44.4
70% 68.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.01
4K Write 0.92
4K Mixed 0.45
58% 1.46 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 37%
WD My Passport 0810 1TB
35GB free, PID 0810
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
25.6% Poor
Read 52.3
Write 56.4
Mixed 48.5
68% 52.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 1.84
4K Mixed 0.25
73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
39.1% Below average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 14.9
44% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 6.8
16% 5.63 GB/s
Latency 143
28% 143 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN Notebook Builds (Compare 67 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP OMEN Notebook

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback