Dell Precision WorkStation T7400

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics26.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Precision WorkStation T7400  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0RW199
Memory7.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110523
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 18 '16 at 04:43
Run Duration433 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5430
CPU, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
45% Average
Memory 62.8
1-Core 38.2
2-Core 74.3
38% 58.4 Pts
4-Core 149
8-Core 268
25% 208 Pts
64-Core 274
17% 274 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 45%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-Ti-$362
PNY(196E 1000) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6881
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.3% Poor
Lighting 32.1
Reflection 32.9
Parallax 40
26% 35 fps
MRender 42.2
Gravity 30.3
Splatting 27.9
27% 33.5 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M4 256GB-$218
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 000F Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 43% Great: 74%
Seagate ST373454SS 73GB
14GB free
Firmware: S412
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
36.6% Below average
Read 65.7
Write 61.5
Mixed 62.3
48% 63.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.01
4K Write 1.11
4K Mixed 0.47
115% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 48%
Seagate ST373454SS 73GB
2GB free
Firmware: S412
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 28% Great: 48%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA332 1TB
200GB free, PID ce23
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
11.8% Very poor
Read 23.5
Write 21.9
Mixed 8.93
22% 18.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 1.16
4K Mixed 0.25
50% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 19%
MAXTOR S TM3500630AS 500GB
53GB free, PID 0c25
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
7.82% Terrible
Read 23
Write 15.3
Mixed 14.7
21% 17.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.32
4K Write 0.35
4K Mixed 0.16
18% 0.28 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.82%
Great: 18%
Maxtor OneTouch III 160GB
43GB free, PID 7212
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
11.7% Very poor
Read 25.3
Write 22.6
Mixed 12.7
24% 20.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 0.97
4K Mixed 0.38
48% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB FB-DIMM DDR2 FB-DIMM
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
16.9% Very poor
MC Read 5.1
MC Write 4.8
MC Mixed 6.8
16% 5.57 GB/s
SC Read 2.7
SC Write 4.7
SC Mixed 4
11% 3.8 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 142%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision WorkStation T7400 Builds (Compare 205 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: Dell Precision WorkStation T7400

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $238
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback