Asus CM1855

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Gunboat	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	12.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	55.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus CM1855 (all builds)
Memory	10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20130820
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Jul 11 '16 at 16:03
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	31%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8300-$168 49,767 User benchmarks, average bench 58% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	57.7% Above average	Memory 80.2 1-Core 60.1 2-Core 110 53% 83.4 Pts	4-Core 193 8-Core 278 30% 236 Pts	64-Core 313 19% 313 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 57.7% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7770 38,053 User benchmarks, average bench 12% Asus(1043 8760) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1003 Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	12.7% Very poor	Lighting 15.4 Reflection 15.9 Parallax 21.7 13% 17.7 fps	MRender 13 Gravity 15.9 Splatting 18 13% 15.6 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 12.7% Great: 14%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston RBU-SC400S37128 128GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 10GB free (System drive) Firmware: 505ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 109 109 22719212 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 4 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 -114667036859632 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1871 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 535 (B1) Unknown 0 0 12 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 38 48 68722622502 (C2) HDA temperature 38 48 68722622502 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 22719212 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 4 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 22719212 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 22719212 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 94 94 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 35451 (EA) Unknown 0 0 13617 (F1) Unknown 0 0 13617 (F2) Unknown 0 0 11066	55.3% Above average	Read 488 Write 132 Mixed 143 55% 254 MB/s	4K Read 18.7 4K Write 42 4K Mixed 15.5 70% 25.4 MB/s	DQ Read 178 DQ Write 120 DQ Mixed 39.9 59% 113 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 55.3% Great: 68%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$33 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 207GB free Firmware: CC44 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 118 99 200133800 (03) Spinup time 98 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1065 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 77 60 57776287 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 6442 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1027 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 61 52 722731047 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 127 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 55 55 90329 (C2) HDA temperature 39 48 73014444071 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 130970732729573 (F1) Unknown 100 253 26342006464 (F2) Unknown 100 253 32505619921	93.6% Outstanding	Read 184 Write 143 Mixed 139 116% 155 MB/s	4K Read 0.54 4K Write 1.02 4K Mixed 0.24 69% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 93.6% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata MI64C1D1629Z1 2x8GB 2,816 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	38.7% Below average	MC Read 16.1 MC Write 11.7 MC Mixed 13.3 39% 13.7 GB/s	SC Read 8.3 SC Write 7.4 SC Mixed 10.1 25% 8.6 GB/s	Latency 80.2 50% 80.2 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 38.7% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CM1855 Builds (Compare 38 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 14%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus CM1855

CPU
FX-8300AMD $168Bench 58%, 49,767 samples	17x
FX-8120AMDBench 56%, 25,690 samples	10x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	5x

GPU
HD 7770AMDBench 12%, 38,053 samples	6x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	3x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	3x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	2x
M4 128GBCrucial $116Bench 60%, 34,516 samples	1x
840 Evo 120GBSamsung $85Bench 91%, 104,444 samples	1x

RAM
MI64C1D1629Z1 2x8GBAdataBench 54%, 2,816 samples	4x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 54%, 43,127 samples	3x
AO2L16BC8R2-BR2S Corsair CML16GX3M2A1600C10 16GBAdataBench 25%, 4 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $211

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16