Asus H97-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics51.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive99% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus H97-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150520
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 09 '16 at 13:40
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1225 v3-$170
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Memory 92.5
1-Core 107
2-Core 212
79% 137 Pts
4-Core 419
8-Core 422
56% 421 Pts
64-Core 419
26% 419 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5891
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
51.6% Above average
Lighting 64.2
Reflection 69.4
Parallax 60.3
52% 64.6 fps
MRender 73.9
Gravity 60.2
Splatting 54
50% 62.7 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
175GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
99% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 402
Mixed 422
98% 441 MB/s
4K Read 34.1
4K Write 79.2
4K Mixed 45.8
152% 53 MB/s
DQ Read 245
DQ Write 68
DQ Mixed 106
92% 140 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 99%
Great: 124%
HyperX Fury 120GB-$160
91GB free
Firmware: 608ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
67.7% Good
Read 495
Write 155
Mixed 238
65% 296 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 94.2
4K Mixed 17.7
113% 46.1 MB/s
DQ Read 102
DQ Write 154
DQ Mixed 39.1
54% 98.3 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 75%
WD My Book 1230 6TB
4.5TB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
65.5% Good
Read 150
Write 159
Mixed 123
184% 144 MB/s
4K Read 0.95
4K Write 2.87
4K Mixed 0.31
112% 1.38 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 68%
WD My Book 1110 499GB
464GB free, PID 1110
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
19.2% Very poor
Read 37.2
Write 38.3
Mixed 23.4
41% 33 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 1.74
4K Mixed 0.18
67% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
63.8% Good
MC Read 22.8
MC Write 23
MC Mixed 20.4
63% 22.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 21
56% 19.5 GB/s
Latency 63
63% 63 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H97-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,913 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus H97-PLUS - $132

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $567
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback