HP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	5.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	70.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 18E4
Memory	11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20140715
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 09 '16 at 10:26
Run Duration	136 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	40%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4790-$135 255,027 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	75.3% Very good	Memory 83.2 1-Core 115 2-Core 213 78% 137 Pts	4-Core 363 8-Core 562 57% 462 Pts	64-Core 583 36% 583 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 75.3% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% HP(103C 2B4E) 2GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6839 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	5.4% Terrible	Lighting 6.7 Reflection 7.19 Parallax 7.84 6% 7.25 fps	MRender 4.62 Gravity 7.1 Splatting 7.17 5% 6.3 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.4% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD7SB3Q-128G-1006 128GB 2,148 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 110GB free Firmware: X2180006 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 252 252 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 252 252 3 (0C) Power cycle count 252 252 31 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 196608 (AE) Unknown 252 252 16 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 63 29 37 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	81.1% Excellent	Read 386 Write 291 Mixed 320 74% 333 MB/s	4K Read 31.8 4K Write 78 4K Mixed 23.2 119% 44.3 MB/s	DQ Read 297 DQ Write 272 DQ Mixed 54.1 104% 208 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 81.1% Great: 95%
Samsung MZ7PD128HCFV-000H1 128GB 3,024 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 20GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM01H0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1644 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 114 (AA) Unknown 100 100 2288 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 97 97 103 (AE) Unknown 99 99 14 (B7) Unknown 99 99 2 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 58 34 (C4) Reallocation count 253 253 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0	70.3% Very good	Read 454 Write 161 Mixed 161 56% 259 MB/s	4K Read 28.9 4K Write 77.5 4K Mixed 20.9 112% 42.4 MB/s	DQ Read 312 DQ Write 111 DQ Mixed 60.5 84% 161 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 70.3% Great: 107%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 907GB free Firmware: 03.01A03 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 176 175 2191 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 167 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 1473 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 111 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 59 555614241 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 12 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 154 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	99.2% Outstanding	Read 174 Write 171 Mixed 152 124% 166 MB/s	4K Read 1.12 4K Write 2.69 4K Mixed 0.34 134% 1.38 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 99.2% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G M378B5173QH0-CK0 Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G 16GB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	55.1% Above average	MC Read 20.4 MC Write 20.3 MC Mixed 15.7 54% 18.8 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 21.1 SC Mixed 19.4 52% 18.3 GB/s	Latency 74.8 54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 55.1% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR Builds (Compare 3,649 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR

CPU
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	840x
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	762x
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	748x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	1,198x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	367x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	246x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	183x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	59x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	56x

RAM
HMT451U6BFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 51%, 8,612 samples	53x
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 2x4GBMicronBench 52%, 17,707 samples	46x
M378B1G73DB0-CK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 55%, 9,947 samples	43x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $231

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16