Asus Crosshair V Formula

Performance Results


Gaming 43% Speed boat	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 35% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	60.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	43.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus Crosshair V Formula (all builds)
Memory	27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20120419
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 06 '16 at 00:50
Run Duration	212 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	44%

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% AM3r2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	67.3% Good	Memory 89.7 1-Core 70.9 2-Core 135 61% 98.4 Pts	4-Core 244 8-Core 401 39% 322 Pts	64-Core 419 26% 419 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 67.3% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560 214,030 User benchmarks, average bench 79% Gigabyte(1458 36CF) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6839 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	60.9% Good	Lighting 61.1 Reflection 109 Parallax 123 50% 97.7 fps	MRender 101 Gravity 108 Splatting 95.5 82% 101 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 60.9% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 43GB free Firmware: EXM0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 9643 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 124 (B1) Unknown 99 99 28 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 79 51 21 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 86 86 13219 (EB) Unknown 99 99 40 (F1) Unknown 99 99 12188437894	85.6% Excellent	Read 520 Write 409 Mixed 491 105% 473 MB/s	4K Read 32.8 4K Write 77.6 4K Mixed 22.6 120% 44.3 MB/s	DQ Read 35 DQ Write 166 DQ Mixed 23.3 40% 74.9 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 85.6% Great: 124%
Corsair Force LS 120GB-$98 9,315 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 10GB free Firmware: S8FM Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 14246 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 346 (AA) Unknown 100 100 97 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 54723498 (AE) Unknown 100 100 53 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 53 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 72 (F1) Unknown 100 100 8000 (F2) Unknown 100 100 5169	55% Above average	Read 504 Write 201 Mixed 285 72% 330 MB/s	4K Read 20.4 4K Write 55 4K Mixed 9.51 72% 28.3 MB/s	DQ Read 21.4 DQ Write 61.3 DQ Mixed 9.41 16% 30.7 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 55% Great: 84%
Corsair Force GT 60GB 1,562 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 5GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.3.3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 92 92 17345701 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 76 76 45543833228509 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 930 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 132 (B1) Unknown 0 0 9 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 21 59 8593801237 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 17345701 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 17345701 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 17345701 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 96 96 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 17112 (EA) Unknown 0 0 12856 (F1) Unknown 0 0 12856 (F2) Unknown 0 0 16453	43.1% Average	Read 359 Write 61.5 Mixed 87 36% 169 MB/s	4K Read 25.2 4K Write 53.8 4K Mixed 11 81% 30 MB/s	DQ Read 25.9 DQ Write 54.4 DQ Mixed 9.18 16% 29.8 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 43.1% Great: 69%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$40 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 268GB free Firmware: 05.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 17 (03) Spinup time 171 166 4450 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2898 (05) Reallocated sector count 199 199 1 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 47 47 39123 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1652 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 473 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2424 (C2) HDA temperature 122 92 25 (C4) Reallocation count 199 199 1 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 2 (C8) Write error rate 200 123 47	39.2% Below average	Read 67.7 Write 68.4 Mixed 76.4 54% 70.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.93 4K Write 2.15 4K Mixed 0.36 118% 1.15 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 39.2% Great: 76%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$109 43,695 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 268GB free Firmware: 51.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 53 (03) Spinup time 107 92 7641 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3196 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 53 53 34685 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1312 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 319 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 134 134 199682 (C2) HDA temperature 124 95 23 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 1	54.2% Above average	Read 110 Write 78.6 Mixed 65.7 63% 84.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.45 4K Write 1.56 4K Mixed 0.19 69% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 54.2% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 32GB 5,781 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	48.2% Average	MC Read 19.1 MC Write 15.3 MC Mixed 17.4 49% 17.3 GB/s	SC Read 9.7 SC Write 8.9 SC Mixed 12.3 29% 10.3 GB/s	Latency 67.6 59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 48.2% Great: 101%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Crosshair V Formula Builds (Compare 273 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 26%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair V Formula - $220

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	82x
FX-8150AMD $770Bench 59%, 22,181 samples	53x
FX-8120AMDBench 56%, 25,690 samples	29x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	20x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	15x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	13x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	12x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	11x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	9x

RAM
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	170x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	35x
32GBUnknownBench 53%, 5,781 samples	31x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $680

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16