| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 29.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
| Motherboard | Asrock Z77 Pro4-M (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, |
| OS | Windows 8.1 |
| BIOS Date | 20120510 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 05 '16 at 20:17 |
| Run Duration | 198 Seconds |
| Run User | HRV-User |
| Background CPU | 10% |
PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
80.3%
Excellent
|
78% 137 Pts
|
57% 428 Pts
|
27% 438 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Gigabyte(1458 368E) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6822
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29.6%
Poor
|
28% 40.3 fps
|
32% 39.9 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
68.5%
Good
|
85% 113 MB/s
|
7% 0.05 MB/s
| |
|
StoreJet Transcend 320GB
215GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
|
11.5%
Very poor
|
38% 29.7 MB/s
|
10% 0.14 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
51.7%
Above average
|
51% 17.8 GB/s
|
44% 15.2 GB/s
|
56% 71 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Z77 Pro4-M Builds (Compare 331 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Pro4-M
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples | 89x |
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 75x |
| Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples | 58x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 25x |
| HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples | 24x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 21x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 85% - Excellent | Total price: $368 |