Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (94th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 6 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	6.18% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

PC Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4308U 150 User benchmarks, average bench 58% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	65.2% Good	Memory 85.4 1-Core 100 2-Core 190 73% 125 Pts	4-Core 263 8-Core 263 35% 263 Pts	64-Core 263 16% 263 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 65.2% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Iris Pro HD 5100 (Mobile 1.1 GHz) 4,565 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Apple(106B 0141) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4331 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	6.18% Terrible	Lighting 7.17 Reflection 7.19 Parallax 11.7 6% 8.68 fps	MRender 7.76 Gravity 4.37 Splatting 11.7 7% 7.93 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.18% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 0x483943434E4E4E424C54424C41522D4E5444 2x4GB 604 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	57.5% Above average	MC Read 19.1 MC Write 22.7 MC Mixed 17.9 57% 19.9 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 18.2 SC Mixed 19.2 51% 17.8 GB/s	Latency 71.7 56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 57.5% Great: 57%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

GPU
Iris Pro HD 5100 (Mobile 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 4,565 samples	118x
HD 5000 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 6,906 samples	34x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	1x

SSD
SM0256G PCIe 251GBAppleBench 149%, 1,022 samples	8x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	5x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x

RAM
0x483943434E4E4E424C54414C41522D4E5444 2x4GBUnknownBench 50%, 289 samples	37x
0x4B3445364533303445452D45474345 2x4GBUnknownBench 50%, 415 samples	24x
0x4544464232333241314D412D47442D46 2x8GBUnknownBench 49%, 56 samples	20x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16