Asus X205TA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 17%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive24.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemAsus X205TA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X205TA
Memory1.3 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20150904
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 23 '16 at 09:08
Run Duration218 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom Z3735F
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.35 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
36.7% Below average
Memory 63.8
1-Core 16.5
2-Core 32.6
29% 37.6 Pts
4-Core 59.3
8-Core 59.3
8% 59.3 Pts
64-Core 59.4
4% 59.4 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)
Asus(1043 18CD) 1,020MB
Driver: igdumdim32.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3643
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
0.7% Terrible
Lighting 0.7
Reflection 0.92
Parallax 0.72
1% 0.78 fps
MRender 1.48
Gravity 0.57
Splatting 1.39
1% 1.14 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.7%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SDW32G 31GB
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0.1
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
24.4% Poor
Read 169
Write 72.8
Mixed 97.5
25% 113 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 19
4K Mixed 4.55
44% 13.9 MB/s
DQ Read 18.6
DQ Write 22.4
DQ Mixed 4.58
8% 15.2 MB/s
Generic 00000 SD Card 32GB
5GB free
Firmware: 1.0
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 4% Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 1 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
21.7% Poor
MC Read 8
MC Write 8.2
MC Mixed 6.7
22% 7.63 GB/s
SC Read 2.8
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 4.4
12% 4.13 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback