bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory2.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 998 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150921
Uptime5.4 Days
Run DateJun 21 '16 at 11:14
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2670-$53
CPU socket #0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
46.1% Average
Memory 66.3
1-Core 75.2
2-Core 147
56% 96 Pts
4-Core 152
8-Core 153
20% 152 Pts
64-Core 153
10% 153 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Vmware SVGA 3D
Vmware(15AD 0405) 384MB
Driver: vm3dum64.dll Ver. 8.15.1.45
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.09% Terrible
Lighting 0.17
Reflection 0.19
Parallax 0.12
0% 0.16 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 0.09%
Great: 69%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 64GB
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 94%
Vmware Virtual disk 4GB
3GB free
Firmware: 1.0
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 28% Great: 115%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 64 slots used
4GB DIMM DRAM
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
38.6% Below average
MC Read 19.3
MC Write 11.4
MC Mixed 12
41% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 6.9
23% 7.97 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,240 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback