MSI X99S GAMING 7 (MS-7885)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics37.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive243% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7885
MotherboardMSI X99S GAMING 7 (MS-7885)  (all builds)
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160411
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJun 11 '16 at 22:15
Run Duration275 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Memory 94
1-Core 97.1
2-Core 196
76% 129 Pts
4-Core 381
8-Core 610
61% 496 Pts
64-Core 788
49% 788 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
Gigabyte(1458 360C) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6839
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
37.5% Below average
Lighting 46.9
Reflection 42.2
Parallax 53.9
38% 47.7 fps
MRender 56.6
Gravity 39.7
Splatting 39
36% 45.1 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$625
206GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
243% Outstanding
Read 2,276
Write 1,232
Mixed 1,463
366% 1,657 MB/s
4K Read 37.3
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 52.2
189% 71.1 MB/s
DQ Read 470
DQ Write 364
DQ Mixed 208
212% 347 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 243%
Great: 283%
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116
79GB free
Firmware: MU01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
87% Excellent
Read 522
Write 326
Mixed 391
91% 413 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 83.9
4K Mixed 30
120% 46.2 MB/s
DQ Read 173
DQ Write 257
DQ Mixed 48.4
83% 159 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 87%
Great: 97%
Samsung 840 250GB-$251
79GB free
Firmware: DXT09B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
73% Very good
Read 510
Write 237
Mixed 113
62% 287 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 69.1
4K Mixed 12.5
88% 35.1 MB/s
DQ Read 359
DQ Write 215
DQ Mixed 30.9
92% 202 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 73%
Great: 85%
Samsung 840 120GB-$109
25GB free
Firmware: DXT09B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
61.7% Good
Read 491
Write 133
Mixed 151
56% 259 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 68.2
4K Mixed 9.88
85% 33.9 MB/s
DQ Read 319
DQ Write 126
DQ Mixed 28.1
72% 158 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 73%
Hitachi HTS545050B9A300 500GB-$71
286GB free
Firmware: PB4OC64G Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
41.6% Average
Read 73.2
Write 71.5
Mixed 68.8
54% 71.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 1.34
4K Mixed 0.35
84% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 45%
Samsung Flash Drive DUO 64GB
18GB free, PID 1000, Samsung Memory On the Go USB Flash Drive 64GB
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
49.2% Average
Read 123
Write 114
Mixed 112
148% 116 MB/s
4K Read 5.02
4K Write 1.74
4K Mixed 1.24
120% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial Ballistix Sport DDR4 2400 C16 4x4GB-$84
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 39.3
MC Write 41.4
MC Mixed 36.6
112% 39.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 21.3
52% 18.3 GB/s
Latency 59.7
67% 59.7 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 102%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99S GAMING 7 (MS-7885) Builds (Compare 634 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI X99S GAMING 7 (MS-7885) - $289

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 40% - Below average Total price: $1,014
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback