ADD TO PC
BUILD

Aures YUNO

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 56% Gunboat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	4.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	67.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Aures YUNO (all builds)
Motherboard	Quanta X7D
Memory	5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20160304
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 11 '16 at 19:51
Run Duration	258 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-5010U 11,105 User benchmarks, average bench 48% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	56% Above average	Memory 81.9 1-Core 67.7 2-Core 128 57% 92.4 Pts	4-Core 177 8-Core 178 24% 178 Pts	64-Core 180 11% 180 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 56% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz) 231,498 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Intel(8086 1616) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.14.4222 Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	4.37% Terrible	Lighting 5.17 Reflection 4.65 Parallax 6.31 4% 5.38 fps	MRender 4.33 Gravity 4.9 Splatting 7.22 5% 5.48 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.37% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Techman SCSH01 64GB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 33GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.09 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 503 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 7 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 11 (AE) Unknown 100 100 7 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 43 61 3997739 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 0 (EA) Unknown 0 0 0 (F1) Unknown 0 0 53 (F2) Unknown 0 0 15	67.7% Good	Read 517 Write 167 Mixed 164 61% 283 MB/s	4K Read 29.3 4K Write 65.9 4K Mixed 15.3 99% 36.8 MB/s	DQ Read 211 DQ Write 157 DQ Mixed 25.8 62% 131 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 67.7% Great: 78%
210 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 1GB free, PID 4200 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	4.66% Terrible	Read 16.8 Write 5.2 Mixed 5.84 10% 9.28 MB/s	4K Read 4.53 4K Write 0.009 4K Mixed 0.005 17% 1.51 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.66% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5428-018.A00LF 1x8GB 6,120 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	31.9% Below average	MC Read 11.2 MC Write 10.6 MC Mixed 9 29% 10.3 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 11.1 SC Mixed 9.8 29% 10.3 GB/s	Latency 77.1 52% 77.1 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 31.9% Great: 32%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback