Lenovo 20DKS0FA00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20DKS0FA00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20DKS0FA00
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20150202
Uptime14 Days
Run DateJun 07 '16 at 02:33
Run Duration93 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Memory 77.9
1-Core 90.4
2-Core 150
63% 106 Pts
4-Core 191
8-Core 222
27% 207 Pts
64-Core 216
13% 216 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Legend(17AA 503E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.14.4156
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
4.69% Terrible
Lighting 4.8
Reflection 7.15
Parallax 5.91
4% 5.95 fps
MRender 6.86
Gravity 4.7
Splatting 10.1
6% 7.23 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.69%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSFJ256GCSU 256GB
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JULA1102
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
78.1% Very good
Read 479
Write 429
Mixed 471
103% 460 MB/s
4K Read 15.9
4K Write 48.8
4K Mixed 20.9
77% 28.6 MB/s
DQ Read 175
DQ Write 235
DQ Mixed 126
117% 179 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5174BM0-YK0 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
51.3% Above average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 21.5
MC Mixed 16.5
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 10.7
SC Mixed 14.6
36% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 84.6
47% 84.6 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback