Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics35.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140409
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 04 '16 at 11:24
Run Duration376 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$47
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
63.6% Good
Memory 89.2
1-Core 70
2-Core 137
61% 98.6 Pts
4-Core 214
8-Core 268
31% 241 Pts
64-Core 282
18% 282 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 380-$200
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 16.200.1013.0
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
35.8% Below average
Lighting 44.5
Reflection 51.1
Parallax 54.1
36% 49.9 fps
MRender 50.4
Gravity 39.6
Splatting 39.3
35% 43.1 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
141GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
78.1% Very good
Read 463
Write 367
Mixed 396
91% 409 MB/s
4K Read 35.5
4K Write 57.4
4K Mixed 20.6
110% 37.8 MB/s
DQ Read 104
DQ Write 104
DQ Mixed 17.9
37% 75.3 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 124%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 16GB
10GB free, PID 0098
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
6.37% Terrible
Read 24.7
Write 6.56
Mixed 7.11
13% 12.8 MB/s
4K Read 5.69
4K Write 0.002
4K Mixed 0.004
21% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.37%
Great: 9%
USB DISK 2.0 4GB
3GB free, PID 4100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
4.75% Terrible
Read 16
Write 5.84
Mixed 7.16
10% 9.66 MB/s
4K Read 3.95
4K Write 0.07
4K Mixed 0.06
19% 1.36 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.75%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45% Average
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 12.6
MC Mixed 14.8
45% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 12.6
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 68.3
59% 68.3 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 45%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 581 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0 - $166

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $512
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback