Hp-pavilion AY696AA-AR6 600-1137d

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive37.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHp-pavilion AY696AA-AR6 600-1137d  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON E66
Memory2.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100401
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateMay 26 '16 at 00:22
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 M 350-$199
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.25 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
43.4% Average
Memory 62.5
1-Core 53.9
2-Core 100
44% 72.2 Pts
4-Core 143
8-Core 143
19% 143 Pts
64-Core 143
9% 143 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 44%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z22000RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37.9% Below average
Read 230
Write 203
Mixed 217
48% 217 MB/s
4K Read 15.2
4K Write 47.6
4K Mixed 3.57
53% 22.1 MB/s
DQ Read 21.9
DQ Write 55.3
DQ Mixed 3.22
13% 26.8 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 78%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
67GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
70% Good
Read 121
Write 123
Mixed 121
92% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 2.35
4K Mixed 0.22
90% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 70%
Great: 85%
ASMT 2115 128GB
7GB free, PID 1153
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
25.2% Poor
Read 27.7
Write 18
Mixed 24.1
29% 23.2 MB/s
4K Read 5.38
4K Write 5.19
4K Mixed 2.84
293% 4.47 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 198%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
FE02 EBJ21UE8BDS0-DJ-F 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
23.8% Poor
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 10.1
23% 8.2 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 6
17% 6 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 23.8%
Great: 25%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback