Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	22.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	55.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Motherboard	Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	9.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20120917
Uptime	6.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 16 '18 at 10:44
Run Duration	190 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-6300-$47 261,607 User benchmarks, average bench 55% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	64.2% Good	Memory 86.1 1-Core 66 2-Core 132 59% 94.5 Pts	4-Core 236 8-Core 307 35% 271 Pts	64-Core 305 19% 305 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 64.2% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170 123,956 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Gigabyte(1458 354E) 2GB CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 399.7 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	22.5% Poor	Lighting 26.6 Reflection 24.8 Parallax 32.7 22% 28 fps	MRender 33.3 Gravity 30.6 Splatting 26.1 24% 30 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 22.5% Great: 21%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$28 133,640 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 77GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z22000RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 293 306 303 303 303 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	55.2% Above average	Read 349 Write 306 Mixed 212 SusWrite 292 65% 290 MB/s	4K Read 21.3 4K Write 60.7 4K Mixed 7.5 74% 29.8 MB/s	DQ Read 24.6 DQ Write 87 DQ Mixed 9.1 20% 40.2 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 55.2% Great: 86%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 689GB free Firmware: CC47 SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 179 177 175 177 181 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 177 Write 128 Mixed 68 SusWrite 178 100% 138 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1 180% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 112%
Seagate Expansion Desk 2TB 307 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 885GB free, PID 3322 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 170 170 171 170 171 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	64.7% Good	Read 164 Write 120 Mixed 73.7 SusWrite 164 171% 131 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 64.7% Great: 73%
HitachiG ST 1TB 711 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 735GB free, PID 1014 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 29 28 28 28 28 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	14.4% Very poor	Read 27.3 Write 27 Mixed 25 SusWrite 27.8 37% 26.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 70% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 14.4% Great: 41%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7 60,636 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 1GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 4.6 12 17 16 16 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	8.85% Terrible	Read 25.5 Write 14.8 Mixed 7.8 SusWrite 11.6 18% 14.9 MB/s	4K Read 7.2 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.6 57% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 8.85% Great: 23%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5474-026.A00LF 9905403-400.A00LF 99U5474-016.A00LF 12GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (21^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	33.4% Below average	MC Read 11.6 MC Write 11.1 MC Mixed 10.5 32% 11.1 GB/s	SC Read 8.8 SC Write 8.2 SC Mixed 9.8 26% 8.93 GB/s	Latency 71.2 56% 71.2 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 33.4% Great: 39%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 753 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	379x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	102x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	82x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	44x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	43x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	29x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	26x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	21x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	21x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	43x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 50%, 19,207 samples	11x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 56%, 22,320 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $729

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16