Asus UX301LAB

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics5.08% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemAsus UX301LAB  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK UX301LAB
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150813
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateOct 16 '18 at 10:43
Run Duration103 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-5200U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 1.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
39.3% Below average
Memory 63
1-Core 34.8
2-Core 61.4
36% 53.1 Pts
4-Core 92.3
8-Core 93.2
12% 92.8 Pts
64-Core 88.8
6% 88.8 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Asus(1043 1A2D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4549
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
5.08% Terrible
Lighting 5.17
Reflection 7.31
Parallax 6.62
4% 6.37 fps
MRender 7.9
Gravity 5
Splatting 10.8
7% 7.91 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.08%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBU-SNS6100S3128GD 128GB
3GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S8FM08.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 319
Write 58.5
Mixed 89.7
34% 156 MB/s
4K Read 12.5
4K Write 36.1
4K Mixed 12.7
54% 20.4 MB/s
DQ Read 170
DQ Write 67.1
DQ Mixed 63.6
62% 100 MB/s
Poor: 25% Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.7% Below average
MC Read 11.1
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 13.8
35% 12.3 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 8.7
21% 7.5 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical UX301LAB Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus UX301LAB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback