Asus EX-A320M-GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 43% Speed boat	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 40% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	53.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus EX-A320M-GAMING (all builds)
Memory	5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170912
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 16 '18 at 09:21
Run Duration	123 Seconds
Run User	MYS-User
Background CPU	17%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110 392,253 User benchmarks, average bench 70% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	71.4% Very good	Memory 71.9 1-Core 104 2-Core 209 71% 128 Pts	4-Core 382 8-Core 602 60% 492 Pts	64-Core 776 48% 776 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 71.4% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Nvidia(10DE 11C2) 3GB CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 416.34 Performing below potential (77^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	53.1% Above average	Lighting 65.3 Reflection 63.5 Parallax 56.4 53% 61.7 fps	MRender 67 Gravity 62.9 Splatting 64.4 53% 64.8 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 53.1% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 140GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 348 219 218 213 213 207 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Read 483 Write 468 Mixed 405 SusWrite 236 89% 398 MB/s	4K Read 39 4K Write 89.1 4K Mixed 51 172% 59.7 MB/s	DQ Read 377 DQ Write 352 DQ Mixed 363 273% 364 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 124%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 731GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 166 168 170 171 171 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	100% Outstanding	Read 179 Write 179 Mixed 119 SusWrite 169 119% 162 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1.2 231% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C15 2x4GB 38,955 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	74.7% Very good	MC Read 30.4 MC Write 26 MC Mixed 27.9 80% 28.1 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 18 SC Mixed 19.1 50% 17.5 GB/s	Latency 97.1 41% 97.1 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 74.7% Great: 91%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EX-A320M-GAMING Builds (Compare 1,223 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 41%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus EX-A320M-GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $85Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	165x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	156x
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	95x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	93x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	92x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	60x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	54x
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	34x
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	32x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBCorsairBench 82%, 52,667 samples	46x
M378A1K43CB2-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 80%, 29,586 samples	33x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	28x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $243

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16