| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master! |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 3.41% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| Motherboard | ECS H81H3-M3 (all builds) |
| Memory | 2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20140515 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 15 '18 at 17:22 |
| Run Duration | 121 Seconds |
| Run User | GRC-User |
| Background CPU | 8% |
PC Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
70.1%
Very good
|
78% 134 Pts
|
38% 285 Pts
|
17% 278 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)
Elitegroup(1019 7EAD) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3355
|
3.41%
Terrible
|
3% 4.49 fps
|
4% 4.88 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
384GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS1O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 148 143 135 142 159 MB/s
|
93.4%
Outstanding
|
97% 135 MB/s
|
118% 1 MB/s
| |
|
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
445GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 140 138 141 138 142 MB/s
|
84.4%
Excellent
|
96% 130 MB/s
|
244% 1.8 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Team Team-Elite-1600 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
32.6%
Below average
|
29% 10.2 GB/s
|
30% 10.4 GB/s
|
62% 64.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H81H3-M3 Builds (Compare 360 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: ECS H81H3-M3
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples | 61x |
| Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples | 61x |
| Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples | 34x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 64x |
| HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples | 37x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 21x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $237 |