Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	3.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8750H 442,631 User benchmarks, average bench 70% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	82.2% Excellent	Memory 76 1-Core 127 2-Core 237 81% 147 Pts	4-Core 475 8-Core 710 74% 592 Pts	64-Core 872 54% 872 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 82.2% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 1071) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4973 Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	3.9% Terrible	Lighting 3.9 Reflection 30.9 Parallax 3.75 3% 12.8 fps	MRender 3.76 Gravity 5.1 Splatting 9.3 5% 6.06 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.9% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$56 127,507 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 931GB free Firmware: SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 126 128 130 130 129 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	65.6% Good	Read 109 Write 20 Mixed 106 SusWrite 119 66% 88.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 4.1 4K Mixed 5.1 705% 3.57 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 65.6% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GB 73,050 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	41.6% Average	MC Read 17 MC Write 14.8 MC Mixed 11.1 41% 14.3 GB/s	SC Read 12.2 SC Write 12.6 SC Mixed 12.8 36% 12.5 GB/s	Latency 88.3 45% 88.3 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 41.6% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	1,102x
Core i5-8300HIntelBench 65%, 167,898 samples	220x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	772x
GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 29%, 105,856 samples	549x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	1x

SSD
RBUSNS8154P3128GJ 128GBKingstonBench 81%, 18,233 samples	325x
RBUSNS8154P3256GJ 256GBKingstonBench 96%, 18,615 samples	107x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 177%, 99,566 samples	63x

RAM
HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 73,050 samples	274x
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 44%, 44,819 samples	220x
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 96,646 samples	111x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16