Asrock H87M

Performance Results


Gaming 25% Surfboard	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	29.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	65.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock H87M (all builds)
Memory	10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130508
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Oct 08 '18 at 01:53
Run Duration	234 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	46%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770-$75 176,321 User benchmarks, average bench 70% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	71.9% Very good	Memory 92.8 1-Core 95.8 2-Core 174 72% 121 Pts	4-Core 281 8-Core 376 42% 328 Pts	64-Core 486 30% 486 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 71.9% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Nvidia(10DE 11BF) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 416.16 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29.1% Poor	Lighting 35.3 Reflection 29.5 Parallax 40.6 29% 35.1 fps	MRender 37.9 Gravity 37 Splatting 35.1 30% 36.7 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 29.1% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 67GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 182 145 154 157 229 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	65.4% Good	Read 420 Write 235 Mixed 212 SusWrite 177 58% 261 MB/s	4K Read 24.7 4K Write 47.2 4K Mixed 28 98% 33.3 MB/s	DQ Read 178 DQ Write 153 DQ Mixed 167 125% 166 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 65.4% Great: 124%
Apacer AS340 240GB 1,254 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 61GB free Firmware: 6A SusWrite @10s intervals: 294 277 233 262 256 274 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	69.3% Good	Read 371 Write 335 Mixed 304 SusWrite 266 72% 319 MB/s	4K Read 23.5 4K Write 44.3 4K Mixed 29.9 97% 32.6 MB/s	DQ Read 183 DQ Write 164 DQ Mixed 102 96% 150 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 69.3% Great: 113%
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100 46,066 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 101GB free Firmware: BBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 155 176 174 146 140 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	62.2% Good	Read 332 Write 151 Mixed 227 SusWrite 162 48% 218 MB/s	4K Read 25.5 4K Write 46.2 4K Mixed 29.7 101% 33.8 MB/s	DQ Read 182 DQ Write 157 DQ Mixed 145 116% 161 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 62.2% Great: 87%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64 143,477 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 693GB free Firmware: 1A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 86 82 89 78 89 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	49.7% Average	Read 88 Write 84.3 Mixed 73.5 SusWrite 84.8 61% 82.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.6 131% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 49.7% Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 605GB free Firmware: CC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 132 136 147 128 147 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	92.1% Outstanding	Read 182 Write 138 Mixed 72.5 SusWrite 139 97% 133 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 162% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 92.1% Great: 112%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB 9,084 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 1TB free, PID a202 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 97 92 99 88 100 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	33.4% Below average	Read 55.7 Write 58 Mixed 25.2 SusWrite 95.9 81% 58.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.5 66% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 33.4% Great: 49%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-037.A00LF 99U5471-039.A00LF 16GB 94 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (25^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	50.7% Above average	MC Read 14.6 MC Write 21.3 MC Mixed 15 48% 17 GB/s	SC Read 12.8 SC Write 18.5 SC Mixed 17 46% 16.1 GB/s	Latency 62.4 64% 62.4 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 50.7% Great: 64%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H87M Builds (Compare 95 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H87M - $151

CPU
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	28x
Core i5-4670Intel $52Bench 66%, 49,019 samples	9x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	8x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	9x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	6x
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples	6x

SSD
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	4x
730 Series 240GBIntel $250Bench 84%, 8,417 samples	3x
SA400S37960G 960GBKingstonBench 70%, 56,609 samples	3x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	5x
99U5471-054.A00LF 2x8GBKingstonBench 53%, 9,823 samples	4x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $297

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16