Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 39% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	52.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (91%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A6-9210 APU (2016 M.SR) 1,036 User benchmarks, average bench 30% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	36.7% Below average	Memory 60.7 1-Core 52.1 2-Core 62.5 39% 58.4 Pts	4-Core 74.7 8-Core 82.7 10% 78.7 Pts	64-Core 84.2 5% 84.2 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 36.7% Great: 40%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R4 Graphics 13,349 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Legend(17AA 36BE) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 16.6 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	2.63% Terrible	Lighting 3.07 Reflection 6.31 Parallax 4.09 2% 4.49 fps	MRender 3.33 Gravity 2.83 Splatting 4.13 3% 3.43 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.63% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial M500 240GB-$54 31,779 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 182GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 221 225 234 239 239 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	52.5% Above average	Read 335 Write 255 Mixed 270 SusWrite 228 61% 272 MB/s	4K Read 14.9 4K Write 28.9 4K Mixed 17.5 60% 20.4 MB/s	DQ Read 153 DQ Write 139 DQ Mixed 129 101% 140 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 52.5% Great: 91%
Seagate Expansion 1TB 60,540 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 873GB free Firmware: 060E SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 101 102 103 103 103 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	58.7% Above average	Read 102 Write 63.5 Mixed 57.4 SusWrite 102 60% 81.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.6 132% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 58.7% Great: 66%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT8G4SFD824A.C16FE CT4G4SFS8213.C8FBD2 12GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 2400, 2133 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	24.5% Poor	MC Read 9.1 MC Write 7.6 MC Mixed 8.4 24% 8.37 GB/s	SC Read 6.1 SC Write 7.2 SC Mixed 7.5 20% 6.93 GB/s	Latency 126 32% 126 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 24.5% Great: 25%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16