Toshiba SATELLITE L50-A-1EJ

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	4.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	84.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Run History

7 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Toshiba SATELLITE L50-A-1EJ (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA VG10S
Memory	10.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20140919
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 17 '16 at 21:52
Run Duration	90 Seconds
Run User	UKR-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4700MQ-$209 69,603 User benchmarks, average bench 59% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	66.4% Good	Memory 88.4 1-Core 82.6 2-Core 137 64% 103 Pts	4-Core 242 8-Core 380 38% 311 Pts	64-Core 380 24% 380 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 66.4% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Toshiba(1179 FA47) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4061 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	4.43% Terrible	Lighting 4.87 Reflection 7.54 Parallax 6.66 4% 6.35 fps	MRender 9.48 Gravity 2.23 Splatting 7.61 5% 6.44 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.43% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Transcend SSD370 256GB-$110 5,249 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 115GB free (System drive) Firmware: N1114B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 470 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 259 (A0) Unknown 100 100 0 (A1) Unknown 100 100 44 (A3) Unknown 100 100 25 (A4) Unknown 100 100 17677 (A5) Unknown 100 100 52 (A6) Unknown 100 100 2 (A7) Unknown 100 100 17 (A8) Unknown 100 100 3000 (A9) Unknown 100 100 100 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 13 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 0 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 1750 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 81729 (F2) Unknown 100 100 77934 (F5) Unknown 100 100 141416	84.1% Excellent	Read 511 Write 277 Mixed 358 84% 382 MB/s	4K Read 22.3 4K Write 75 4K Mixed 30.9 113% 42.8 MB/s	DQ Read 263 DQ Write 271 DQ Mixed 65.6 105% 200 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 84.1% Great: 96%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5428-018.A00LF Hynix HMT451S6MFR8A-PB 12GB 38 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	56.8% Above average	MC Read 21.5 MC Write 20.9 MC Mixed 17.2 57% 19.9 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 17.7 SC Mixed 17.7 46% 16.2 GB/s	Latency 69.1 58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 56.8% Great: 55%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SATELLITE L50-A-1EJ Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 55%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE L50-A-1EJ

CPU
Core i7-4700MQIntel $209Bench 59%, 69,603 samples	7x

GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	4x
GeForce GT 740MNvidiaBench 6%, 15,605 samples	3x

SSD
RBUSC180DS37128GH 128GBKingstonBench 61%, 216 samples	3x

RAM
4KTF25664HZ-1G6E1 Hynix HMT451S6MFR8A-PB 6GBMicronBench 42%, 151 samples	5x
CT102464BF160B.C16 Hynix HMT451S6MFR8A-PB 12GBUnknownBench 41%, 26 samples	1x
M471B5273CH0-YK0 Hynix HMT451S6MFR8A-PB 8GBSamsungBench 50%, 18 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $209

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16