Asus Rampage II Extreme

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	13.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	63.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus Rampage II Extreme (all builds)
Memory	4.2 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110919
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 26 '18 at 14:04
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X5675 8,072 User benchmarks, average bench 75% LGA1366, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	79.4% Very good	Memory 97.7 1-Core 102 2-Core 202 78% 134 Pts	4-Core 331 8-Core 566 54% 448 Pts	64-Core 749 46% 749 Pts
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 79.4% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 460-$203 31,648 User benchmarks, average bench 12% EVGA(3842 1372) 1GB CLim: 763 MHz, MLim: 950 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	13.8% Very poor	Lighting 15.7 Reflection 18.7 Parallax 14.2 13% 16.2 fps	MRender 22.5 Gravity 16.2 Splatting 18.8 16% 19.2 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 13.8% Great: 14%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 81GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0DB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 154 134 134 137 141 MB/s Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	63.1% Good	Read 246 Write 238 Mixed 211 SusWrite 150 48% 211 MB/s	4K Read 22.8 4K Write 56.2 4K Mixed 36.7 111% 38.6 MB/s	DQ Read 204 DQ Write 193 DQ Mixed 149 126% 182 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 63.1% Great: 108%
Ocz-vertex PLUS R2 62GB 506 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 27GB free Firmware: 1.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 72 72 72 71 72 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	22.9% Poor	Read 156 Write 77.2 Mixed 78.8 SusWrite 71.9 21% 95.9 MB/s	4K Read 11.1 4K Write 13.1 4K Mixed 7.9 34% 10.7 MB/s	DQ Read 80.7 DQ Write 13 DQ Mixed 9.2 16% 34.3 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 22.9% Great: 27%
Samsung Flash Drive 64GB 8,748 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 59GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 16 17 17 21 16 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	12.7% Very poor	Read 31.6 Write 12.5 Mixed 26.8 SusWrite 18.4 28% 22.3 MB/s	4K Read 2.9 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 1.6 103% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 12.7% Great: 111%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3x2GB 45,030 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 3 of 6 slots used 6GB DIMM Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	60.2% Good	MC Read 22.4 MC Write 18.5 MC Mixed 22.2 60% 21 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 11.7 SC Mixed 15.5 39% 13.7 GB/s	Latency 47.6 84% 47.6 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 60.2% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Rampage II Extreme Builds (Compare 527 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 37%

Jet ski

Desktop 70%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 29%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus Rampage II Extreme

CPU
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples	176x
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples	46x
Core i7 975Intel $550Bench 72%, 3,143 samples	46x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	30x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	30x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	30x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	22x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	14x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	13x

RAM
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	109x
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	83x
3x4GBUnknownBench 42%, 39,448 samples	46x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $316

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16