Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	3.29% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	72.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7400-$110 234,266 User benchmarks, average bench 64% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	80.3% Excellent	Memory 89.1 1-Core 100 2-Core 197 75% 129 Pts	4-Core 412 8-Core 423 56% 418 Pts	64-Core 418 26% 418 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 80.3% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 84DC) ≥ 4GB CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 275 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	3.29% Terrible	Lighting 4.13 Reflection 4.96 Parallax 3.5 3% 4.2 fps	MRender 4.71 Gravity 4.1 Splatting 3.09 3% 3.97 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.29% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 182GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1D1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 257 193 202 257 196 251 MB/s Performing below potential (62^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	72.1% Very good	Read 169 Write 95.3 Mixed 209 SusWrite 226 40% 175 MB/s	4K Read 23 4K Write 78.7 4K Mixed 37.1 124% 46.3 MB/s	DQ Read 262 DQ Write 317 DQ Mixed 207 179% 262 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 72.1% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown RMUA5120MB86H9F2400 859B CT4G4DFS824A.C8FF 8GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 2400, 2400 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	70.5% Very good	MC Read 27.2 MC Write 26 MC Mixed 21.4 71% 24.9 GB/s	SC Read 15.9 SC Write 24.9 SC Mixed 22.4 60% 21.1 GB/s	Latency 68.3 59% 68.3 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 70.5% Great: 70%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16