| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 32.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 41.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Asus CG8350 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | ASUSTeK CG8350 |
| Memory | 15.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20120405 |
| Uptime | 5.8 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 25 '18 at 23:02 |
| Run Duration | 139 Seconds |
| Run User | SWE-User |
| Background CPU | 14% |
PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
65.8%
Good
|
65% 111 Pts
|
43% 340 Pts
|
26% 418 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX Titan-$1,088
EVGA(3842 2790) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 411.63
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
32.3%
Below average
|
30% 46.8 fps
|
36% 45.7 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 88 86 67 67 65 MB/s
|
41.9%
Average
|
36% 163 MB/s
|
85% 26.9 MB/s
|
34% 47.2 MB/s
|
|
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
282GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 91 93 74 68 68 MB/s
|
70.9%
Very good
|
91% 124 MB/s
|
206% 1.53 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
806GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 112 112 113 113 114 MB/s
|
66%
Good
|
74% 101 MB/s
|
178% 1.2 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
31.5%
Below average
|
29% 10.2 GB/s
|
29% 10.2 GB/s
|
49% 81.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical CG8350 Builds (Compare 103 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Asus CG8350
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-2600Intel $194Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 61x |
| Core i5-2320Intel $165Bench 64%, 38,345 samples | 11x |
| Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples | 9x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 14x |
| GTX 560 TiNvidia $188Bench 16%, 42,397 samples | 13x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 8x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 71% - Very good | Total price: $410 |