Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.07% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	91.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150212
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 25 '18 at 17:43
Run Duration	187 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8150-$770 22,181 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	63.8% Good	Memory 80.6 1-Core 71.5 2-Core 136 58% 96.2 Pts	4-Core 255 8-Core 372 39% 314 Pts	64-Core 371 23% 371 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 63.8% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 85BA) ≥ 4GB CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 275 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 382.5 Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	3.07% Terrible	Lighting 3.77 Reflection 4.65 Parallax 3.34 3% 3.92 fps	MRender 4.33 Gravity 4.07 Splatting 3.09 3% 3.83 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.07% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$55 75,831 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 166GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 327 214 212 220 224 217 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	91.4% Outstanding	Read 491 Write 449 Mixed 310 SusWrite 236 83% 372 MB/s	4K Read 36.4 4K Write 63.7 4K Mixed 46.8 149% 49 MB/s	DQ Read 241 DQ Write 237 DQ Mixed 254 187% 244 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 91.4% Great: 114%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100 65,786 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 191GB free Firmware: 1AA01118 SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 73 77 79 79 74 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	44% Average	Read 76.5 Write 79.5 Mixed 57.2 SusWrite 76.5 53% 72.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1.1 193% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 44% Great: 62%
Samsung HD502IJ 500GB-$40 25,285 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 51GB free Firmware: 1AA01113 SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 76 75 76 76 76 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	47% Average	Read 87.8 Write 57.2 Mixed 54.5 SusWrite 75.6 51% 68.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1 177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 47% Great: 59%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50 72,924 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 22GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 92 92 92 93 93 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	57.9% Above average	Read 109 Write 28 Mixed 63.7 SusWrite 92.2 54% 73.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.2 212% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 57.9% Great: 77%
WD WD20EURS-63S48Y0 2TB 12,928 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 491GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 79 80 82 81 81 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	46.9% Average	Read 82.8 Write 77.8 Mixed 41 SusWrite 80.2 52% 70.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.8 158% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 46.9% Great: 77%
Seagate Expansion Desk 2TB 7,241 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 50GB free, PID 3312 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 106 100 109 101 96 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	55.1% Above average	Read 74.8 Write 90.8 Mixed 52 SusWrite 99.7 110% 79.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 7.3 4K Mixed 0.6 270% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 55.1% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB 78,181 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	27.4% Poor	MC Read 9.2 MC Write 8.9 MC Mixed 7.8 25% 8.63 GB/s	SC Read 8.4 SC Write 9.1 SC Mixed 9 25% 8.83 GB/s	Latency 79.4 50% 79.4 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 27.4% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5A97 EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 581 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 38%

Jet ski

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 31%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0 - $166

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	227x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	102x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	95x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	41x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	30x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	27x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	29x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	21x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	18x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	22x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	12x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBHyperX $35Bench 51%, 38,490 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Very good

Total price: $512

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16