Samsung R59P/R60P/R61P

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSamsung R59P/R60P/R61P  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG R59P/R60P/R61P
Memory0.4 GB free of 1 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20071228
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateSep 25 '18 at 12:37
Run Duration226 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Dual T2330-$90
U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
32% Below average
Memory 58.5
1-Core 16.9
2-Core 35
27% 36.8 Pts
4-Core 35.4
8-Core 36
5% 35.7 Pts
64-Core 33.9
2% 33.9 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 32%
Great: 36%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon Xpress 1250
Sanyo(144D C034) 256MB
Driver: atiumdag.dll Ver. 8.383.1.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Lighting 0.3
Reflection 0.5
0% 0.4 fps
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HM121HI 120GB
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LZ100-06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.3 11 18 25 22 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Read 32.1
Write 21.6
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 18.8
18% 24.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
93% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x0.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
1GB DIMM DRAM
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
9.35% Terrible
MC Read 3.6
MC Write 1.9
MC Mixed 2.6
8% 2.7 GB/s
SC Read 3.4
SC Write 2.8
SC Mixed 0.1
6% 2.1 GB/s
Latency 132
30% 132 ns
Poor: 4%
This bench: 9.35%
Great: 15%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical R59P/R60P/R61P Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung R59P/R60P/R61P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $100
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback