Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 38% Jet ski	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	41.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo T6670 2,094 User benchmarks, average bench 35% Intel(R) Genuine processor, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	38.8% Below average	Memory 67.4 1-Core 31.9 2-Core 60.3 36% 53.2 Pts	4-Core 62.5 8-Core 59.7 8% 61.1 Pts	64-Core 61.9 4% 61.9 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 38.8% Great: 40%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Royal BNA Driver 48 User benchmarks, average bench 0% HP(103C 1526) Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 3.1.1.64 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.47% Terrible	Lighting 0.57 Reflection 0.46 Parallax 0.5 0% 0.51 fps	MRender 0.43 Gravity 0.57 Splatting 0.74 0% 0.58 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.47% Great: 0%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intenso SATA III SSD 240GB 2,727 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 106GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM71.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 68 46 47 48 47 MB/s Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	41.8% Average	Read 214 Write 95.8 Mixed 201 SusWrite 78 33% 147 MB/s	4K Read 17.9 4K Write 39.1 4K Mixed 18.1 71% 25 MB/s	DQ Read 162 DQ Write 146 DQ Mixed 136 107% 148 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 41.8% Great: 96%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	14.9% Very poor	MC Read 5.3 MC Write 3.9 MC Mixed 3.9 12% 4.37 GB/s	SC Read 5.2 SC Write 4.3 SC Mixed 4.6 13% 4.7 GB/s	Latency 108 37% 108 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 14.9% Great: 65%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 34%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron Dual-Core T3000IntelBench 34%, 1,043 samples	1x
Core2 Duo T9600Intel $170Bench 39%, 2,726 samples	1x

GPU
Intel 4 Series Express Chipset Family v2MobileBench 0%, 39 samples	1x
Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset FamilyIntelBench 0%, 23,924 samples	1x

SSD
SSDPR-CL100-240-G3 240GBBench 66%, 1,084 samples	1x
MX300 275GBCrucial $100Bench 79%, 67,541 samples	1x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16