Lenovo 30BJS01900

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics16.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemLenovo 30BJS01900  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 103D
Memory8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180302
Uptime21.4 Days
Run DateSep 25 '18 at 10:22
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7500-$89
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Memory 58.7
1-Core 113
2-Core 152
62% 108 Pts
4-Core 307
8-Core 339
42% 323 Pts
64-Core 429
26% 429 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P600
Nvidia(10DE 11BD) 2GB
CLim: 1620 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 376.99
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
16.8% Very poor
Lighting 21.2
Reflection 14.1
Parallax 16.6
17% 17.3 fps
MRender 20.4
Gravity 18.8
Splatting 19.3
16% 19.5 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8TB8U512G1001 512GB
228GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X4133101
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 318
Write 252
Mixed 227
59% 266 MB/s
4K Read 18.2
4K Write 37.2
4K Mixed 22.2
76% 25.9 MB/s
DQ Read 30.4
DQ Write 89.5
DQ Mixed 136
82% 85.3 MB/s
Poor: 57% Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
66.7% Good
MC Read 28.2
MC Write 27.9
MC Mixed 18.7
71% 24.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 19.1
50% 17.4 GB/s
Latency 131
30% 131 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback