PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 36.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 58.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-990FX-GAMING (all builds) |
Memory | 5 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.9 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20160406 |
Uptime | 1.1 Days |
Run Date | Sep 25 '18 at 08:00 |
Run Duration | 177 Seconds |
Run User | THA-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
59.6%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD RX 470-$126
CLim: 1150 MHz, MLim: 1650 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.4.1
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
36.3%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
OCZ Trion 100 120GB-$60
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 33 44 52 51 54 MB/s
|
58.1%
Above average
|
|||
Gamer 24 0MG100-B1 240GB
24GB free
Firmware: 1.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 351 339 290 283 287 174 MB/s
|
82.1%
Excellent
|
|||
47.3%
Average
|
||||
WD Black 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$45
193GB free
Firmware: 12.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 60 61 65 70 64 MB/s
|
32.5%
Below average
|
|||
WD My Passport 25E1 1TB
232GB free, PID 25e1
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 30 31 31 31 31 MB/s
|
17.9%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
46.9%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 122x |
FX-8370AMD $175Bench 62%, 34,720 samples | 33x |
FX-9590AMD $298Bench 63%, 26,109 samples | 32x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RX 580AMD $140Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 17x |
R9 380AMD $200Bench 33%, 83,027 samples | 16x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 12x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 84% - Excellent | Total price: $320 |