Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 33% Sail boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	5.76% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	23.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Compaq-presario GC662AA-ABA SR5113WM (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTek IVY
Memory	1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20070515
Uptime	6.5 Days
Run Date	Sep 25 '18 at 04:20
Run Duration	150 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	34%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 3600+ 784 User benchmarks, average bench 32% Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	30.1% Below average	Memory 52.5 1-Core 21.8 2-Core 43.5 27% 39.3 Pts	4-Core 47.6 8-Core 47.1 6% 47.3 Pts	64-Core 47.6 3% 47.6 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 30.1% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9800 GT 19,550 User benchmarks, average bench 5% EVGA(3842 C973) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 341.74 Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	5.76% Terrible	Lighting 7.9 Reflection 8.15 Parallax 2.31 6% 6.12 fps	MRender 4.38 Gravity 6.4 Splatting 5.43 4% 5.41 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.76% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 240GB 38,401 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 169GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 104 98 109 165 131 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	23.4% Poor	Read 166 Write 110 Mixed 127 SusWrite 120 29% 131 MB/s	4K Read 7.3 4K Write 9.6 4K Mixed 7.5 26% 8.13 MB/s	DQ Read 26.5 DQ Write 38.5 DQ Mixed 25.2 21% 30.1 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 23.4% Great: 95%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	13.4% Very poor	MC Read 3.7 MC Write 4.3 MC Mixed 4.7 12% 4.23 GB/s	SC Read 3.5 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 3.7 11% 3.87 GB/s	Latency 152 26% 152 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 13.4% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16