Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	8.88% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	71.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4700MQ-$209 69,603 User benchmarks, average bench 59% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	63.5% Good	Memory 87.6 1-Core 88.3 2-Core 127 64% 101 Pts	4-Core 214 8-Core 314 33% 264 Pts	64-Core 344 21% 344 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 63.5% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 750M 13,088 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Legend(17AA 3800) 2GB CLim: 1058 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 398.82 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	8.88% Terrible	Lighting 9.87 Reflection 8.96 Parallax 11.7 8% 10.2 fps	MRender 13.3 Gravity 11.8 Splatting 13.3 10% 12.8 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 8.88% Great: 9%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Trion 150 480GB-$300 13,412 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 311GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFZ12.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 287 130 228 238 168 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	71.1% Very good	Read 456 Write 427 Mixed 344 SusWrite 213 81% 360 MB/s	4K Read 19.3 4K Write 45 4K Mixed 25 85% 29.8 MB/s	DQ Read 337 DQ Write 269 DQ Mixed 180 168% 262 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 71.1% Great: 101%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB 64D0JKHNK 16GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	51.7% Above average	MC Read 19.8 MC Write 20.5 MC Mixed 16.4 54% 18.9 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 10 SC Mixed 8.7 29% 10.3 GB/s	Latency 69.9 57% 69.9 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 51.7% Great: 55%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

GPU
GeForce GT 755MNvidiaBench 9%, 3,890 samples	452x
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	447x
GeForce GT 750MNvidiaBench 8%, 13,088 samples	217x

RAM
RMT3170EB68F9W1600 2x4GBRamaxelBench 50%, 5,069 samples	173x
M471B1G73QH0-YK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 52%, 22,647 samples	69x
HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB 2x8GBHynixBench 51%, 18,309 samples	66x

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $289

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16