HP Z400 Workstation

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	74% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP Z400 Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 0AE4h
Memory	4.1 GB free of 8.00195 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130715
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	May 12 '16 at 23:24
Run Duration	295 Seconds
Run User	CHE-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon W3565 7,121 User benchmarks, average bench 67% CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	64.3% Good	Memory 86.6 1-Core 82.8 2-Core 167 67% 112 Pts	4-Core 244 8-Core 251 33% 247 Pts	64-Core 330 20% 330 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 64.3% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 1800 6,394 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Nvidia(10DE 062C) 768MB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.4195 Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	3.28% Terrible	Lighting 3.9 Reflection 3.81 Parallax 1.56 3% 3.09 fps	MRender 6.1 Gravity 3.03 Splatting 3.91 4% 4.35 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.28% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 480GB 11,256 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 296GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0. Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	74% Very good	Read 528 Write 329 Mixed 370 90% 409 MB/s	4K Read 18.2 4K Write 60.9 4K Mixed 19.3 85% 32.8 MB/s	DQ Read 88.9 DQ Write 237 DQ Mixed 49.4 70% 125 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 74% Great: 182%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82 64,359 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 1TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 179 172 4050 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3944 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 7945 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2496 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 166 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 3777 (C2) HDA temperature 116 109 31 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	61.6% Good	Read 111 Write 103 Mixed 102 80% 106 MB/s	4K Read 0.49 4K Write 2.18 4K Mixed 0.21 84% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 61.6% Great: 86%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 771GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 193 193 11329 (03) Spinup time 253 166 966 (04) Start/Stop count 92 92 8080 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 2 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 74 74 19704 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5093 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 627 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 1 1 918945 (C2) HDA temperature 116 99 34 (C4) Reallocation count 199 199 1 (C5) Current pending sector count 199 199 327 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 1 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 176 143 6417	51.7% Above average	Read 87.8 Write 92.1 Mixed 92.1 68% 90.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.66 4K Mixed 0.22 75% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 51.7% Great: 67%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82 64,359 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 534GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 176 169 4183 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3813 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 7902 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2496 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 168 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 3644 (C2) HDA temperature 116 107 31 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	49.7% Average	Read 78.9 Write 94.5 Mixed 84.4 65% 85.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.49 4K Write 0.36 4K Mixed 0.14 43% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 49.7% Great: 86%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 4TB 1,113 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2TB free, PID d011 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	18.3% Very poor	Read 30.9 Write 27.6 Mixed 28.9 37% 29.2 MB/s	4K Read 3.51 4K Write 2.26 4K Mixed 0.27 99% 2.01 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 18.3% Great: 75%
Multiple Card Reader 16GB 2,333 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 15GB free, PID 6366 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	7.64% Terrible	Read 22.9 Write 15.9 Mixed 16.3 22% 18.4 MB/s	4K Read 3.42 4K Write 0.01 4K Mixed 0.01 14% 1.15 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 7.64% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:01 98 9905402-544.A00LF ID:01 98 9905402-544.A00LF 42GB 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 34816 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	33.4% Below average	MC Read 12.4 MC Write 10.9 MC Mixed 9.6 31% 11 GB/s	SC Read 8.6 SC Write 9.8 SC Mixed 9.4 26% 9.27 GB/s	Latency 70.8 56% 70.8 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z400 Workstation Builds (Compare 3,316 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: HP Z400 Workstation

CPU
Xeon W3520Intel $230Bench 63%, 6,508 samples	569x
Xeon W3550IntelBench 66%, 7,649 samples	534x
Xeon W3565IntelBench 67%, 7,121 samples	487x

GPU
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	272x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	155x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	137x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	136x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	73x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	65x

RAM
ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 42GBUnknownBench 37%, 128 samples	22x
ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 46GBUnknownBench 45%, 108 samples	18x
ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 46GBUnknownBench 46%, 280 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $258

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $183	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16