Asus STRIX Z270H GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics29.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive223% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus STRIX Z270H GAMING  (all builds)
Memory60.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 3 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171225
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 23 '18 at 19:51
Run Duration241 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Memory 95.4
1-Core 152
2-Core 274
97% 174 Pts
4-Core 472
8-Core 794
77% 633 Pts
64-Core 790
49% 790 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 399.24
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.2% Poor
Lighting 33
Reflection 38.2
Parallax 30.9
27% 34.1 fps
MRender 47.2
Gravity 33
Splatting 43
34% 41.1 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
170GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 822 559 526 538 524 513 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
223% Outstanding
Read 1,988
Write 1,677
Mixed 678
SusWrite 580
273% 1,231 MB/s
4K Read 40.2
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 59.8
206% 76.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,092
DQ Write 922
DQ Mixed 797
654% 937 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 223%
Great: 254%
OCZ Vector 180 480GB-$140
45GB free
Firmware: 1.01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 380 415 280 337 290 324 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 474
Write 469
Mixed 333
SusWrite 338
91% 403 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 38.7
155% 61.1 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 348
DQ Mixed 232
209% 318 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 103%
Great: 110%
HP EX920 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$116
954GB free
Firmware: SVN139B Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1453 1577 475 525 791 594 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
305% Outstanding
Read 2,556
Write 1,277
Mixed 1,398
SusWrite 902
340% 1,533 MB/s
4K Read 66.2
4K Write 157
4K Mixed 91
300% 105 MB/s
DQ Read 1,324
DQ Write 1,099
DQ Mixed 1179
892% 1,201 MB/s
Poor: 158%
This bench: 305%
Great: 355%
OCZ ARC 100 240GB-$120
76GB free
Firmware: 1.01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 377 386 422 385 423 376 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 400
Write 415
Mixed 318
SusWrite 395
86% 382 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 38.2
149% 58.9 MB/s
DQ Read 305
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 249
208% 298 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 100%
Great: 101%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
107GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 143 143 146 146 146 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
67.7% Good
Read 90.8
Write 91.5
Mixed 69
SusWrite 145
73% 99 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
217% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3020 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
96.1% Outstanding
MC Read 34.5
MC Write 36.8
MC Mixed 29.8
96% 33.7 GB/s
SC Read 22
SC Write 40.6
SC Mixed 30.4
89% 31 GB/s
Latency 56
72% 56 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 96.1%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical STRIX Z270H GAMING Builds (Compare 3,208 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus STRIX Z270H GAMING - $247

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $747
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback