Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 55% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	2.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	72.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2720QM-$85 7,798 User benchmarks, average bench 58% CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	58.5% Above average	Memory 79.2 1-Core 61.9 2-Core 129 55% 90 Pts	4-Core 215 8-Core 246 30% 231 Pts	64-Core 280 17% 280 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 58.5% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 1000M 6,108 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Legend(17AA 21CF) 2GB CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 369.9 Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	2.82% Terrible	Lighting 4 Reflection 5.12 Parallax 3.38 3% 4.16 fps	MRender 1.71 Gravity 2.1 Splatting 3.09 2% 2.3 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.82% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Series 500GB 7,390 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 424GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXT08B0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 293 294 331 330 338 332 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	72.8% Very good	Read 446 Write 314 Mixed 176 SusWrite 320 70% 314 MB/s	4K Read 17.4 4K Write 41.4 4K Mixed 20.6 75% 26.5 MB/s	DQ Read 376 DQ Write 187 DQ Mixed 62.7 105% 209 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 72.8% Great: 89%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905428-093.A00LF 9905428-093.A00LF 99U5428-018.A00LF 99U5428-018.A00LF 32GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	47.8% Average	MC Read 16.7 MC Write 17.3 MC Mixed 15.5 47% 16.5 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 13.8 SC Mixed 16 42% 14.5 GB/s	Latency 82 49% 82 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 47.8% Great: 49%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 55%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i7-2720QMIntel $85Bench 58%, 7,798 samples	2x

GPU
Quadro 1000MNvidiaBench 3%, 6,108 samples	2x

SSD
MX500 1TBCrucial $66Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	1x

RAM
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 24GBM471B1G73BH0-YK0Bench 42%, 5 samples	1x
M471B5273CH0-CH9 Kingston 9905469-154.A00LF M471B5273CH0-CH9 Kingston 9905469-154.A00LF 16GBSamsungBench 45%, 2 samples	1x

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $151

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16