MSI Z170A GAMING M7 (MS-7976)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics63.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive120% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7976
MotherboardMSI Z170A GAMING M7 (MS-7976)  (all builds)
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151021
Uptime4.6 Days
Run DateSep 23 '18 at 14:59
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
84.5% Excellent
Memory 92.9
1-Core 127
2-Core 248
88% 156 Pts
4-Core 411
8-Core 654
65% 532 Pts
64-Core 690
43% 690 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 399.24
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
63.7% Good
Lighting 81
Reflection 86.7
Parallax 77
66% 81.6 fps
MRender 75.3
Gravity 74.3
Splatting 68.8
59% 72.8 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 2TB-$120
985GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 425 379 410 440 432 443 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 514
Write 455
Mixed 417
SusWrite 421
102% 452 MB/s
4K Read 36.7
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 54.1
185% 68.2 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 287
236% 337 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 120%
Great: 125%
HGST Deskstar NAS 6TB-$250
787GB free
Firmware: APGNT517
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 124 130 129 125 122 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
65.1% Good
Read 101
Write 104
Mixed 57
SusWrite 126
71% 97.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 120%
HGST Deskstar NAS 6TB-$250
1TB free
Firmware: APGNT517
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 139 137 143 132 140 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
94.3% Outstanding
Read 191
Write 200
Mixed 82.7
SusWrite 137
112% 153 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
203% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 94.3%
Great: 120%
HGST Deskstar NAS 6TB-$250
2.5TB free
Firmware: APGNT517
SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 209 207 205 220 203 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
97.6% Outstanding
Read 131
Write 133
Mixed 59.3
SusWrite 210
97% 133 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 97.6%
Great: 120%
HGST Deskstar NAS 4TB-$60
923GB free
Firmware: MJAOA5E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 139 140 141 142 141 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
71.1% Very good
Read 108
Write 109
Mixed 37.2
SusWrite 140
72% 98.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
170% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 92%
Hitachi HDN721010ALE604 10TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 83XN
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 177 178 177 177 179 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 175
Write 196
Mixed 100
SusWrite 178
119% 162 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 1.1
331% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 102%
Great: 135%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2133 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
70.8% Very good
MC Read 26.9
MC Write 26.5
MC Mixed 20.4
70% 24.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 22.7
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 62.3
64% 62.3 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170A GAMING M7 (MS-7976) Builds (Compare 2,481 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI Z170A GAMING M7 (MS-7976) - $180

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $897
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback