Asus CROSSHAIR V FORMULA-Z

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics50.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive77.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus CROSSHAIR V FORMULA-Z  (all builds)
Memory13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150323
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 23 '18 at 08:59
Run Duration236 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Memory 92.3
1-Core 75.3
2-Core 126
62% 97.8 Pts
4-Core 271
8-Core 479
45% 375 Pts
64-Core 471
29% 471 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 411.63
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.7% Above average
Lighting 62.7
Reflection 68.6
Parallax 61
51% 64.1 fps
MRender 73.4
Gravity 60.9
Splatting 53.1
50% 62.5 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 240GB-$70
141GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 580A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 191 189 174 161 192 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
77.8% Very good
Read 295
Write 164
Mixed 246
SusWrite 182
50% 222 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 88.7
4K Mixed 39.4
144% 52.9 MB/s
DQ Read 252
DQ Write 219
DQ Mixed 255
186% 242 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 94%
WD Red 8TB (2016)-$180
1TB free
Firmware: 83.H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 152 152 151 149 152 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
74.7% Very good
Read 112
Write 118
Mixed 64.6
SusWrite 148
81% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.4
238% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 97%
WD Red 8TB (2016)-$180
2.5TB free
Firmware: 83.H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 135 136 138 135 139 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Read 164
Write 160
Mixed 73.4
SusWrite 134
97% 133 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.4
234% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 97%
WD Red 8TB (2016)-$180
2.5TB free
Firmware: 83.H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 175 170 173 167 171 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
81.1% Excellent
Read 117
Write 123
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 165
86% 117 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.3
227% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 97%
WD Red 8TB (2016)-$180
482GB free
Firmware: 83.H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 106 102 108 108 109 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
60.4% Good
Read 105
Write 108
Mixed 63.9
SusWrite 105
70% 95.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.4
232% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 97%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
329GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 79 79 79 79 80 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
41.7% Average
Read 65.8
Write 64.6
Mixed 51.7
SusWrite 79
48% 65.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
184% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 83%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
738GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 100 99 100 99 99 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Read 103
Write 101
Mixed 85
SusWrite 98.2
72% 96.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
181% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 83%
WD Red 8TB (2016)-$180
3TB free
Firmware: 83.H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 147 137 146 143 145 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Read 155
Write 162
Mixed 80.6
SusWrite 140
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.4
238% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 97%
WD Green 6TB (2014)-$223
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 104 102 104 104 106 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
68.4% Good
Read 137
Write 138
Mixed 70.6
SusWrite 101
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1
211% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 98%
WD Green 6TB (2014)-$223
3TB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 104 104 106 105 104 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
77.3% Very good
Read 165
Write 158
Mixed 81.6
SusWrite 104
93% 127 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
218% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1866 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
54.8% Above average
MC Read 22.6
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 19.5
57% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 13.3
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 63.5
63% 63.5 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CROSSHAIR V FORMULA-Z Builds (Compare 897 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus CROSSHAIR V FORMULA-Z - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $630
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback