| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 6.03% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus P5K SE/EPU (all builds) |
| Memory | 3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20080314 |
| Uptime | 2.8 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 22 '18 at 19:16 |
| Run Duration | 144 Seconds |
| Run User | UKR-User |
| Background CPU | 28% |
PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
41.6%
Average
|
37% 55.7 Pts
|
16% 115 Pts
|
8% 130 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ATI Radeon HD 3800
Sapphire(174B E630) 512MB
Driver: atiumd64.dll Ver. 8.632.1.2000
|
6.03%
Terrible
|
6% 6.66 fps
|
6% 7.18 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Blue 250GB (2007)-$20
174GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 12.01B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 47 63 65 70 70 MB/s
|
35.8%
Below average
|
45% 60.5 MB/s
|
168% 1.27 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate ST3500630NS 500GB-$53
189GB free
Firmware: 3.AEK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 70 72 71 73 72 MB/s
|
41.2%
Average
|
49% 66.2 MB/s
|
151% 0.93 MB/s
| |
|
StoreJet Transcend 500GB
38GB free, PID 2509
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 25 25 26 26 26 MB/s
|
14.4%
Very poor
|
32% 24.7 MB/s
|
73% 0.87 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
|
18.5%
Very poor
|
17% 6.07 GB/s
|
14% 4.9 GB/s
|
34% 118 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P5K SE/EPU Builds (Compare 87 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P5K SE/EPU
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 16x |
| Core2 Quad Q9300Intel $38Bench 46%, 10,428 samples | 8x |
| Xeon E5450Intel $195Bench 51%, 10,801 samples | 8x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 6x |
| GTX 650-TiNvidia $152Bench 14%, 36,698 samples | 5x |
| GeForce GTX 285NvidiaBench 9%, 2,842 samples | 5x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 43% - Average | Total price: $180 |