Asrock A320M-HDV

Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 15% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	32.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	69.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asrock A320M-HDV (all builds)
Memory	6.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180420
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 22 '18 at 18:43
Run Duration	114 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon X4 950 Quad Core 4,334 User benchmarks, average bench 41% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	50.8% Above average	Memory 63.8 1-Core 71 2-Core 131 52% 88.6 Pts	4-Core 222 8-Core 212 29% 217 Pts	64-Core 226 14% 226 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 50.8% Great: 52%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 8C96) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 411.63 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	32.3% Below average	Lighting 40.2 Reflection 31.7 Parallax 38 33% 36.6 fps	MRender 39.1 Gravity 39.4 Splatting 37.6 32% 38.7 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 32.3% Great: 33%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SU800NS38 128GB 7,443 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 44GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q1204A SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 98 104 104 104 103 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	69.8% Good	Read 396 Write 283 Mixed 288 SusWrite 110 60% 270 MB/s	4K Read 36.1 4K Write 64.6 4K Mixed 41.5 142% 47.4 MB/s	DQ Read 42.2 DQ Write 90.6 DQ Mixed 51 43% 61.3 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 69.8% Great: 102%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G3B1 1x8GB 7,235 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	27.8% Poor	MC Read 11.9 MC Write 8.1 MC Mixed 9.5 28% 9.83 GB/s	SC Read 6.1 SC Write 5.2 SC Mixed 8 18% 6.43 GB/s	Latency 117 34% 117 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 27.8% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A320M-HDV Builds (Compare 831 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Raft

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV

CPU
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples	162x
Ryzen 5 2400GAMD $135Bench 63%, 127,344 samples	85x
Ryzen 3 1200AMD $100Bench 57%, 83,528 samples	82x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	103x
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)AMDBench 10%, 85,536 samples	50x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	42x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	28x
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	27x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	19x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	13x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 2x4GBUnknownBench 75%, 7,488 samples	13x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $231

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $275	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16