Asus P8H61-M LK R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics8.46% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus P8H61-M LK R2.0  (all builds)
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121009
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 22 '18 at 11:13
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$194
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
72.6% Very good
Memory 92.7
1-Core 76.1
2-Core 187
69% 119 Pts
4-Core 306
8-Core 304
41% 305 Pts
64-Core 278
17% 278 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Nvidia(10DE 0000) 3GB
CLim: 783 MHz, MLim: 902 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 388.31
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
8.46% Terrible
Lighting 9.47
Reflection 11.2
Parallax 8.16
8% 9.62 fps
MRender 13.3
Gravity 9.9
Splatting 12.9
10% 12 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 8.46%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$30
33GB free
Firmware: 03070009
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 105 58 59 59 60 MB/s
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
56% Above average
Read 254
Write 218
Mixed 200
SusWrite 90.8
43% 191 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 43.3
4K Mixed 32.6
108% 34.9 MB/s
DQ Read 153
DQ Write 136
DQ Mixed 118
96% 136 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 56%
Great: 85%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
384GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 116 112 83 7.4 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
69.7% Good
Read 166
Write 155
Mixed 37.3
SusWrite 76.5
79% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
146% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 107%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID a202
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 26 25 26 26 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Read 28.5
Write 24
Mixed 19.3
SusWrite 25.5
32% 24.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
73% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-442.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
50.3% Above average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 15.6
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 16
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 62.8
64% 62.8 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H61-M LK R2.0 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M LK R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $381
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback