Dell Studio XPS 1640

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 20%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (5th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 95 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 31% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemDell Studio XPS 1640  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0U785D
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20090507
Uptime4.6 Days
Run DateSep 22 '18 at 02:21
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 55%
CPU Throttled 31%

 PC Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo P8700-$42
U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
22.8% Poor
Memory 44
1-Core 10.5
2-Core 20.9
19% 25.1 Pts
4-Core 11.6
8-Core 19
2% 15.3 Pts
64-Core 19.7
1% 19.7 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3670
Dell(1028 0272) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.7000
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
0.97% Terrible
Lighting 0.03
Reflection 4.92
Parallax 1.16
0% 2.04 fps
MRender 3.24
Gravity 1.03
Splatting 5.3
3% 3.19 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 0.97%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HM500LI 500GB
206GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2TF00_03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8 8.1 7.8 8.5 7 7.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
17.1% Very poor
Read 51.4
Write 10.3
Mixed 9.3
SusWrite 7.9
14% 19.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.4
70% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 38%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
58GB free, PID a007
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 18 18 19 19 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Read 25.1
Write 18
Mixed 16.8
SusWrite 19
26% 19.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
76% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM 15h Reserved
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
8.72% Terrible
MC Read 3.4
MC Write 2.7
MC Mixed 2.4
8% 2.83 GB/s
SC Read 0.5
SC Write 2.1
SC Mixed 1.9
4% 1.5 GB/s
Latency 185
22% 185 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 8.72%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Studio XPS 1640 Builds (Compare 48 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Studio XPS 1640

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 36% - Below average Total price: $80
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback