Gigabyte GA-Z87X-UD5H-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive	92.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Gigabyte Z87X-UD5H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z87X-UD5H-CF (all builds)
Memory	12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130422
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Sep 21 '18 at 23:08
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	55%

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4670K-$62 128,482 User benchmarks, average bench 68% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	81.8% Excellent	Memory 93.2 1-Core 103 2-Core 207 78% 134 Pts	4-Core 410 8-Core 396 54% 403 Pts	64-Core 409 25% 409 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 81.8% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% EVGA(3842 3979) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 411.63 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 43% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 203GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 307 268 274 276 275 274 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	92.2% Outstanding	Read 388 Write 369 Mixed 311 SusWrite 279 76% 337 MB/s	4K Read 33.2 4K Write 84 4K Mixed 40.2 146% 52.5 MB/s	DQ Read 342 DQ Write 315 DQ Mixed 200 185% 286 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 92.2% Great: 118%
Corsair Neutron XT 480GB-$210 846 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 27GB free Firmware: SAFC01.5 SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 236 127 125 126 126 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	95.9% Outstanding	Read 471 Write 453 Mixed 327 SusWrite 162 79% 353 MB/s	4K Read 32.3 4K Write 105 4K Mixed 46.5 164% 61.3 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 354 DQ Mixed 77.3 138% 270 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 95.9% Great: 116%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 895GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 167 167 167 168 164 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	98.9% Outstanding	Read 178 Write 164 Mixed 94.8 SusWrite 166 110% 151 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.2 233% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 98.9% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB 10,150 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	61.2% Good	MC Read 22.3 MC Write 23.2 MC Mixed 18.3 61% 21.3 GB/s	SC Read 14.8 SC Write 20.1 SC Mixed 18.2 51% 17.7 GB/s	Latency 61.7 65% 61.7 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 61.2% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z87X-UD5H-CF Builds (Compare 317 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z87X-UD5H-CF

CPU
Core i7-4770KIntel $120Bench 74%, 172,887 samples	155x
Core i5-4670KIntel $62Bench 68%, 128,482 samples	44x
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	37x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	37x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	21x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	19x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	16x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	14x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	13x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	8x
Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 50%, 23,732 samples	8x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 54%, 43,127 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 65% - Good

Total price: $215

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16