User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (94th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 6 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemRazer Razer Blade
MotherboardRAZER RAZER
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130520
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 21 '18 at 21:02
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4702HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
78.3% Very good
Memory 92.1
1-Core 93.1
2-Core 152
69% 113 Pts
4-Core 356
8-Core 470
52% 413 Pts
64-Core 459
28% 459 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Intel(8086 0416) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.69% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 6.04
Parallax 6.16
3% 5.3 fps
MRender 8.67
Gravity 2.33
Splatting 7.13
5% 6.04 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.69%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZMTD512HAGL-00000 512GB
315GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT4200Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 121 107 107 115 108 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Read 444
Write 198
Mixed 162
SusWrite 122
51% 231 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 67.4
4K Mixed 27.4
113% 40.8 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 140
DQ Mixed 68
100% 195 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6AFR8A-PB 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
56.6% Above average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 16.6
55% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 17.3
SC Mixed 19
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 64
62% 64 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback