Performance Results


Gaming 58% Gunboat	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 46% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	57.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	86.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z97X-Gaming 5 (all builds)
Memory	13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150918
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 21 '18 at 17:31
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4690K-$53 229,359 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	89.9% Excellent	Memory 97.7 1-Core 124 2-Core 247 89% 156 Pts	4-Core 479 8-Core 454 63% 467 Pts	64-Core 473 29% 473 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 89.9% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Gigabyte(1458 367B) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 411.63 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	57.9% Above average	Lighting 73 Reflection 73.9 Parallax 65.2 60% 70.7 fps	MRender 73.9 Gravity 67.2 Splatting 62 55% 67.7 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 57.9% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 460 120GB-$200 1,011 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 55GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 337 235 164 161 158 155 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	86.6% Excellent	Read 415 Write 378 Mixed 302 SusWrite 202 73% 324 MB/s	4K Read 22.9 4K Write 124 4K Mixed 35.2 146% 60.8 MB/s	DQ Read 307 DQ Write 300 DQ Mixed 250 203% 286 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 86.6% Great: 100%
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 250GB 28,058 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 65GB free Firmware: EMT21B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 369 309 308 309 305 289 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	124% Outstanding	Read 469 Write 448 Mixed 381 SusWrite 315 91% 403 MB/s	4K Read 44 4K Write 131 4K Mixed 67.1 222% 80.7 MB/s	DQ Read 383 DQ Write 351 DQ Mixed 364 274% 366 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 124% Great: 122%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 16GB free Firmware: CC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 131 177 173 171 147 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	97.8% Outstanding	Read 187 Write 149 Mixed 86.5 SusWrite 154 105% 144 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 159% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 97.8% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2400 C11 4x4GB 5,522 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	86.2% Excellent	MC Read 31.2 MC Write 33.4 MC Mixed 27.6 88% 30.7 GB/s	SC Read 20.1 SC Write 23.5 SC Mixed 23.6 64% 22.4 GB/s	Latency 47.5 84% 47.5 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 86.2% Great: 91%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 84%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	317x
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	112x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	108x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	96x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	61x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	41x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	99x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	66x
Vengeance Pro DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GBCorsairBench 58%, 40,596 samples	63x

Value: 60% - Above average

Total price: $810

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $48	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16