Asus T100TA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus T100TA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK T100TA
Memory0.8 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1368 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20130922
Uptime7.2 Days
Run DateMay 11 '16 at 14:42
Run Duration338 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom Z3740
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.35 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
32.2% Below average
Memory 53.2
1-Core 17.7
2-Core 35.4
26% 35.4 Pts
4-Core 67.2
8-Core 70
9% 68.6 Pts
64-Core 70.3
4% 70.3 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 33%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)
Asus(1043 14ED) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim32.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3286
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
0.85% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 0.5
Parallax 1
1% 0.83 fps
MRender 1.71
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.17
1% 1.13 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.85%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SEM32G 31GB
1GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.2
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 30% Great: 46%
SanDisk Cruzer Pop 8GB
5GB free, PID 5577
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
9.44% Terrible
Read 19.6
Write 3.74
Mixed 6.24
10% 9.85 MB/s
4K Read 4.63
4K Write 1.53
4K Mixed 1.47
119% 2.54 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.44%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2GB
1066, 1066 MHz
1024, 1024 MB
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
21.7% Poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 7.9
MC Mixed 8.4
23% 8.07 GB/s
SC Read 2.2
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 3.4
9% 3.2 GB/s
Latency 149
27% 149 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 27%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback