Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	28.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	64% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock H170 Performance (all builds)
Memory	4.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151111
Uptime	32.6 Days
Run Date	Sep 21 '18 at 02:54
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	57%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6600K-$81 342,244 User benchmarks, average bench 72% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	62.2% Good	Memory 80.2 1-Core 104 2-Core 195 72% 127 Pts	4-Core 244 8-Core 319 36% 282 Pts	64-Core 324 20% 324 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 62.2% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209 161,132 User benchmarks, average bench 26% MSI(1462 3000) 2GB CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	28.9% Poor	Lighting 34.4 Reflection 30.9 Parallax 39.5 28% 34.9 fps	MRender 41.5 Gravity 37.2 Splatting 34.9 31% 37.9 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 28.9% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 240GB-$193 27,826 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 67GB free (System drive) Firmware: 605ABBF2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 132 145 142 133 134 MB/s Performing below potential (21^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	64% Good	Read 242 Write 223 Mixed 237 SusWrite 135 47% 209 MB/s	4K Read 23 4K Write 75.4 4K Mixed 33.2 117% 43.9 MB/s	DQ Read 196 DQ Write 240 DQ Mixed 176 144% 204 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 64% Great: 84%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 828GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 93 93 92 89 93 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	75.9% Very good	Read 174 Write 156 Mixed 69 SusWrite 90.4 89% 122 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 124% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 75.9% Great: 114%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2TB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 150 144 145 147 147 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	86.1% Excellent	Read 154 Write 133 Mixed 20.8 SusWrite 146 82% 113 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.5 132% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 86.1% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB-$299 20,912 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	64.2% Good	MC Read 22.5 MC Write 26 MC Mixed 22.2 67% 23.6 GB/s	SC Read 10.3 SC Write 21 SC Mixed 15.3 44% 15.5 GB/s	Latency 80.1 50% 80.1 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 64.2% Great: 91%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 45%

Yacht

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 39%

Jet ski

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GBG.SKILL $40Bench 71%, 98,777 samples	12x
M378A1G43EB1-CPB 2x8GBSamsungBench 72%, 3,609 samples	9x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GBCorsair $46Bench 69%, 47,721 samples	7x

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $436

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16