Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 107%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 99%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics113% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus X99-A/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory29.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 20 '18 at 21:02
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
92.5% Outstanding
Memory 95.6
1-Core 127
2-Core 251
89% 158 Pts
4-Core 480
8-Core 834
80% 657 Pts
64-Core 992
61% 992 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Lighting 151
Reflection 156
Parallax 146
123% 151 fps
MRender 124
Gravity 142
Splatting 114
102% 127 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 113%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190
207GB free
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 374 377 379 377 377 379 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
98% Outstanding
Read 426
Write 461
Mixed 331
SusWrite 377
90% 399 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 42.3
162% 61.6 MB/s
DQ Read 33.7
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 148
125% 172 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 98%
Great: 116%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
345GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 375 376 377 377 377 378 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 488
Write 471
Mixed 394
SusWrite 377
97% 432 MB/s
4K Read 41
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 57
191% 67.7 MB/s
DQ Read 42.2
DQ Write 114
DQ Mixed 59.8
51% 72.1 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 106%
Great: 134%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
381GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 377 380 381 379 379 372 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 493
Write 472
Mixed 457
SusWrite 378
101% 450 MB/s
4K Read 40.4
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 55.7
193% 70.3 MB/s
DQ Read 40.7
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 58.5
51% 73.9 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 107%
Great: 133%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$40
149GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 65 64 64 65 65 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
52.7% Above average
Read 122
Write 102
Mixed 104
SusWrite 61.9
73% 97.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
199% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C15 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
125% Outstanding
MC Read 49.3
MC Write 47.8
MC Mixed 48.2
138% 48.4 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 24.4
63% 21.9 GB/s
Latency 55.2
72% 55.2 ns
Poor: 102%
This bench: 125%
Great: 132%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-A/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 1,288 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $357
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback