Asrock B250 Gaming K4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics27.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive186% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock B250 Gaming K4  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180118
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 20 '18 at 11:18
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Memory 91
1-Core 129
2-Core 249
88% 156 Pts
4-Core 420
8-Core 623
65% 522 Pts
64-Core 681
42% 681 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
MSI(1462 2847) 2GB
CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
27.1% Poor
Lighting 31.7
Reflection 29.1
Parallax 36.8
26% 32.5 fps
MRender 40.1
Gravity 38.2
Splatting 32.3
30% 36.9 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
120GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 570 297 292 293 289 289 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
186% Outstanding
Read 1,659
Write 1201
Mixed 508
SusWrite 338
205% 927 MB/s
4K Read 41.9
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 48.7
192% 71.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,042
DQ Write 796
DQ Mixed 724
595% 854 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 186%
Great: 236%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
586GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 111 110 111 111 110 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
51.2% Above average
Read 69.3
Write 71.2
Mixed 46.2
SusWrite 109
54% 73.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 83%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
1TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 85 94 94 95 95 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 94.3
Write 86
Mixed 78.8
SusWrite 90.5
65% 87.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 67%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95
197GB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 112 118 114 112 117 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
65.7% Good
Read 114
Write 106
Mixed 66
SusWrite 115
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 75%
WD Green 2TB (2009)-$113
154GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 55 57 56 57 56 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
33.1% Below average
Read 59.5
Write 59.3
Mixed 52
SusWrite 55.7
42% 56.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 60%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB
7GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.6 11 11 10 11 11 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
12.6% Very poor
Read 23.8
Write 10.5
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 10.5
14% 12.3 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 2.5
167% 3.27 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GB-$46
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
68.1% Good
MC Read 26
MC Write 26.3
MC Mixed 18.9
68% 23.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 26.1
SC Mixed 20.9
60% 21.1 GB/s
Latency 65.8
61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B250 Gaming K4 Builds (Compare 662 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock B250 Gaming K4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $446
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback