Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 38% Jet ski	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Toshiba SATELLITE C670-12L (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA TKBSC
Memory	5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110420
Uptime	4 Days
Run Date	Sep 19 '18 at 17:57
Run Duration	123 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 M 380-$130 21,755 User benchmarks, average bench 40% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	45.2% Average	Memory 65.1 1-Core 46.4 2-Core 95.2 43% 68.9 Pts	4-Core 149 8-Core 145 20% 147 Pts	64-Core 153 10% 153 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 45.2% Great: 46%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 315M 3,213 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Toshiba(1179 FD71) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.26% Terrible	Lighting 1.27 Reflection 2.69 Parallax 0.5 1% 1.49 fps	MRender 3.38 Gravity 0.9 Splatting 2.04 2% 2.11 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.26% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS543232A7A384 320GB-$40 17,642 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 151GB free (System drive) Firmware: ES2OA70B SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.3 21 17 17 25 24 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	9.52% Terrible	Read 14.3 Write 14.3 Mixed 11 SusWrite 18.8 11% 14.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.1 24% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 9.52% Great: 46%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Teikon TMT251S6FR8C-H9HC 2x4GB 59 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	24% Poor	MC Read 7.8 MC Write 6.9 MC Mixed 10.1 24% 8.27 GB/s	SC Read 6.1 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 6.2 16% 5.7 GB/s	Latency 113 35% 113 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 24% Great: 50%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16